Type: Poster presentation
Venue: AGU Fall Meeting 2011
Citation:
Hilary E. Snell; Scott Zaccheo; Alison Chase; Janusz Eluszkiewicz; Lesley E. Ott; Steven Pawson (2011) Assessment of meteorological uncertainties as they apply to the ASCENDS mission. AGU Fall Meeting 2011.
Resource Link: http://sites.agu.org/fallmeeting/scientific-program/
Many environment-oriented remote sensing and modeling applications require precise knowledge of the atmospheric state (temperature, pressure, water vapor, surface pressure, etc.) on a fine spatial grid with a comprehensive understanding of the associated errors. Coincident atmospheric state measurements may be obtained via co-located remote sensing instruments or by extracting these data from ancillary models. The appropriate technique for a given application depends upon the required accuracy. State-of-the-art mesoscale/regional numerical weather prediction (NWP) models operate on spatial scales of a few kilometers resolution, and global scale NWP models operate on scales of tens of kilometers. Remote sensing measurements may be made on spatial scale comparable to the measurement of interest. These measurements normally require a separate sensor, which increases the overall size, weight, power and complexity of the satellite payload. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of the errors associated with each of these approaches is a critical part of the design/characterization of a remote-sensing system whose measurement accuracy depends on knowledge of the atmospheric state.
One of the requirements as part of the overall ASCENDS (Active Sensing of CO2 Emissions over Nights, Days, and Seasons) mission development is to develop a consistent set of atmospheric state variables (vertical temperature and water vapor profiles, and surface pressure) for use in helping to constrain overall retrieval error budget. If the error budget requires tighter uncertainties on ancillary atmospheric parameters than can be provided by NWP models and analyses, additional sensors may be required to reduce the overall measurement error and meet mission requirements. To this end we have used NWP models and reanalysis information to generate a set of atmospheric profiles which contain reasonable variability. This data consists of a “truth” set and a companion “measured” set of profiles. The truth set contains climatologically-relevant profiles of pressure, temperature and humidity with an accompanying surface pressure. The measured set consists of some number of instances of the truth set which have been perturbed to represent realistic measurement uncertainty for the truth profile using measurement error covariance matrices.
The primary focus has been to develop matrices derived using information about the profile retrieval accuracy as documented for on-orbit sensor systems including AIRS, AMSU, ATMS, and CrIS. Surface pressure variability and uncertainty was derived from globally-compiled station pressure information. We generated an additional measurement set of profiles which represent the overall error within NWP models. These profile sets will allow for comprehensive trade studies for sensor system design and provide a basis for setting measurement requirements for co-located temperature, humidity sounders, determine the utility of NWP data to either replace or supplement collocated measurements, and to assess the overall end-to-end system performance of the sensor system.